On 06/10/17 08:37, Igor Mammedov wrote: >> No objections to this patch but just to confirm from the previous >> discussion that the cpu type gets parsed in a way such that an existing >> -cpu "TI SuperSparc II" option gets mapped to the correct >> "TI-SuperSparc-II" type? Presumably this is now handled at a different >> level? > old way still works, see sparc_cpu_type_name() > > call chain is > vl.c: > machine->cpu_type = cpu_parse_cpu_model() > -> sparc_cpu_class_by_name() > -> sparc_cpu_type_name()
Yeah, that's what I was fairly sure the outcome was but couldn't quite see it in that patchset. In that case: Acked-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayl...@ilande.co.uk> ATB, Mark.
