On 1 September 2017 at 18:21, Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com> wrote:
> The VirtMachineState contains some dt phandles that will be used
> in some node creation functions. For instance we plan to use the
> PCI host controller phandle in the smmu node creation function. So
> let's pass the VirtMachineState handle down to the node creation
> functions by enhancing the involved datatypes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  hw/arm/sysbus-fdt.c         | 3 +++
>  hw/arm/virt.c               | 1 +
>  include/hw/arm/sysbus-fdt.h | 2 ++
>  3 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/arm/sysbus-fdt.c b/hw/arm/sysbus-fdt.c
> index d68e3dc..d92a983 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/sysbus-fdt.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/sysbus-fdt.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
>  #include "hw/vfio/vfio-platform.h"
>  #include "hw/vfio/vfio-calxeda-xgmac.h"
>  #include "hw/vfio/vfio-amd-xgbe.h"
> +#include "hw/arm/virt.h"
>  #include "hw/arm/fdt.h"
>
>  /*
> @@ -47,6 +48,7 @@ typedef struct PlatformBusFDTData {
>      int irq_start; /* index of the first IRQ usable by platform bus devices 
> */
>      const char *pbus_node_name; /* name of the platform bus node */
>      PlatformBusDevice *pbus;
> +    VirtMachineState *vms;
>  } PlatformBusFDTData;

sysbus-fdt isn't virt specific, so this doesn't belong here.

More generally, why is sysbus-fdt involved in this at all?
I expected that instantiating and wiring up the SMMU would
be the job of hw/arm/virt.c, like any other device we
might have on the board.

thanks
-- PMM

Reply via email to