On 10/10/2017 07:58 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 04.10.2017 um 04:00 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
>> There are patches floating around to add NBD_CMD_BLOCK_STATUS,
>> but NBD wants to report status on byte granularity (even if the
>> reporting will probably be naturally aligned to sectors or even
>> much higher levels).  I've therefore started the task of
>> converting our block status code to report at a byte granularity
>> rather than sectors.
>>
>> Now that 2.11 is open, I'm rebasing/reposting the remaining patches.
>>
>> The overall conversion currently looks like:
>> part 1: bdrv_is_allocated (merged, commit 51b0a488)
>> part 2: dirty-bitmap (v10 is queued [1])
>> part 3: bdrv_get_block_status (this series, v4 at [2])
>> part 4: .bdrv_co_block_status (v3 is posted [4], mostly reviewed)
>>
>> Available as a tag at:
>> git fetch git://repo.or.cz/qemu/ericb.git nbd-byte-status-v4
>>
>> Based-on: <20170925145526.32690-1-ebl...@redhat.com>
>> ([PATCH v10 00/20] make dirty-bitmap byte-based)
>> Based-on: <20171004014347.25099-1-ebl...@redhat.com>
>> ([PATCH v2 0/5] block: Avoid copy-on-read assertions)
> 
> We merged v3 of that series, which causes merge conflicts in this one.
> I can try to give the patches a look without applying them, but can you
> rebase, please?

Yep, and I have other comments to address anyway.  v6 coming up later today.

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to