Hi
----- Original Message -----
> On 10/10/2017 04:21 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 12:56:18AM +0200, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > [...]
> >> -static inline TPMVersion tpm_get_version(void)
> >> +static inline TPMIf *tpm_find(void)
> >> {
> >> -#ifdef CONFIG_TPM
> >> - Object *obj = object_resolve_path_type("", TYPE_TPM_TIS, NULL);
> >> + Object *obj = object_resolve_path_type("", TYPE_TPM_IF, NULL);
> > Considering that tpm_crb_realizefn() will rely on tpm_find()
> > returning NULL if there are multiple TPM devices, I suggest
> > adding a "returns NULL unless there is exactly one TPM device"
> > comment, just like fw_cfg_find() and find_vmgenid_dev()
>
> I wonder whether the function couldn't have a better name.
> tpm_find_single() ?
>
As Eduardo said, there is precedence in QEMU codebase (fw_cfg_find() and
find_vmgenid_dev())
I don't think foo_find() is a bad name - it returns NULL if there are multiple
foo, which makes sense imho. I'll add the missing comment though.
