On 10/10/2017 06:19 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
Hi
----- Original Message -----
On 10/09/2017 06:56 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
Clean-up is handled by the create() function.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com>
---
hw/tpm/tpm_passthrough.c | 15 ++-------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/tpm/tpm_passthrough.c b/hw/tpm/tpm_passthrough.c
index aa9167e3c6..0806cf86af 100644
--- a/hw/tpm/tpm_passthrough.c
+++ b/hw/tpm/tpm_passthrough.c
@@ -261,27 +261,16 @@ tpm_passthrough_handle_device_opts(TPMPassthruState
*tpm_pt, QemuOpts *opts)
if (tpm_pt->tpm_fd < 0) {
error_report("Cannot access TPM device using '%s': %s",
tpm_pt->tpm_dev, strerror(errno));
- goto err_free_parameters;
+ return -1;
}
if (tpm_util_test_tpmdev(tpm_pt->tpm_fd, &tpm_pt->tpm_version)) {
error_report("'%s' is not a TPM device.",
tpm_pt->tpm_dev);
- goto err_close_tpmdev;
+ return -1;
}
I would prefer the cleanup to happen in the functions where the state is
created...
This is the role for a destructor, no need to worry about local object change
cleanup.
I can drop the patch if you feel strongly about it, but I think it's a nice
code simplification.
I like to see the cleanup code on the bottom...