On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 18:39:37 +0200
Halil Pasic <pa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 09/15/2017 09:27 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> + DEFINE_PROP_UINT8("chpid_type", CcwTesterDevice, chpid_type,
> >>>> + 0x98),
> > This might also need re-evaluation - we should not really need a new
> > chpid type.
> >
>
> I'm back at ccw-tester again (for v2). I've realized we did not agree
> on what to use here (chpid_type). Shall I use 0x25 (Fibre Channel) or
> EMULATED_CCW_3270_CHPID_TYPE, or even 0x32 (virtio-ccw) as a default
> value? And should EMULATED_CCW_3270_CHPID_TYPE be called like that
> (is it really supposed to be specific to 3270?
>
> Sorry I did not notice sooner.
It might make sense to pick whatever z/VM commonly uses for emulated
devices. (Or ask them if they reserved something explicitly for testing
-- that would be an even better match.)
