> On Oct 22, 2017, at 1:33 AM, David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 04:44:58PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> On 10/20/2017 10:55 AM, John Arbuckle wrote:
>>> +static inline size_t strnlen(const char *string, size_t max_count)
>>> +{
>>> + size_t count;
>>> + for (count = 0; count < max_count; count++) {
>>> + if (string[count] == '\0') {
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> + return count;
>>
>> Not to nitpick, but
>>
>> const char *p = memchr(string, 0, max_count);
>> return p ? max_count : p - string;
>
> Richard's right, that's definitely a better implementation.
His implementation is smaller, but this one is even smaller. Plus it uses the
familiar strlen() function:
size_t strnlen(const char *string, size_t max_count)
{
return strlen(string) < max_count ? strlen(string) : max_count;
}
