2010/12/11 Gleb Natapov <g...@redhat.com>: > On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 05:19:01PM +0000, Blue Swirl wrote: >> >> What should we do with >> >> at...@600 vs dr...@1? >> > There is no available IDE OF binding spec, so I when with the way >> > OpenBIOS reports ata on qemu-x86. I have no idea what 600 in at...@600 >> > may mean, but looking at g3_beige_300.html there is no such node there >> > and looking at any other device tree in >> > http://penguinppc.org/historical/dev-trees-html/ >> > I haven't found one that use this kind of addressing for pci-ata. >> > http://penguinppc.org/historical/dev-trees-html/g3bw_400.html for >> > instance has p...@80000000/pci-bri...@d/pci-...@1/ata-4. at...@600 kind of >> > addressing is used by devices on mac-io bus which I do not think we >> > emulate in qemu. So it looks like OpneBIOS is wrong here. >> >> We have PMAC IDE, but this device is CMD646, so mac-io bus addressing >> rules should not be used. >> > So you agree that OpenBIOS is wrong here?
I think so.
