On 10/12/2017 09:53 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: > Hi all. Here is a continuation of my "new backup architecture" series, > The very first part, but it is meaningful itself. > > v2: rebase on master > 01: add test and fix bug
Nice, glad you caught it. Reviewed-by: John Snow <js...@redhat.com> > 02: move commit about NONE mode to this patch, add John's r-b (hope, > you are OK with this tiny change) ACK > 03: tiny refactor (John) Reviewed-by: John Snow <js...@redhat.com> > 04: improve commit message, add John's r-b > 05: add John's r-b > > Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy (5): > hbitmap: add next_zero function > backup: move from done_bitmap to copy_bitmap > backup: init copy_bitmap from sync_bitmap for incremental > backup: simplify non-dirty bits progress processing > backup: use copy_bitmap in incremental backup > > include/block/dirty-bitmap.h | 1 + > include/qemu/hbitmap.h | 8 +++ > block/backup.c | 118 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- > block/dirty-bitmap.c | 5 ++ > tests/test-hbitmap.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > util/hbitmap.c | 39 ++++++++++++++ > 6 files changed, 180 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-) > I'm not sure if this still qualifies for RC, but since it's my fault it languished on the list, I'd still be willing to send the PR and suffer Peter's wrath. I apologize for the unexpected leave. --John
