On 12/14/2010 04:41 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
>  Maybe in this particular case the advantage is minimal.
>  But it seems easier to stick to a rule of no more version
>  bumps than argue about each case.

Do we have such a rule?  If we have a subsection who's needed function
is return 1, I think that's a good indication that it's not appropriate
for a subsection and the end result is equivalent to bumping the main
driver vmstate version.  It's convoluted to try to hide a one-way
upgrade in a subsection.  Thanks,

Indeed, subsections are for data that is rarely needed so that there's some chance (sometimes ~100%) of migration working seemlessly. In this case it's either no-bump-and-live-with-the-consequences, or changing the version id.

Paolo

Reply via email to