Hello, Tao Wu, on mer. 08 nov. 2017 14:53:40 -0800, wrote: > The current code looks buggy, we zero ti_i while we access > ti_dst/ti_src later.
Mmm, indeed, looking again at how it was introduced, it was too much. Samuel
Hello, Tao Wu, on mer. 08 nov. 2017 14:53:40 -0800, wrote: > The current code looks buggy, we zero ti_i while we access > ti_dst/ti_src later.
Mmm, indeed, looking again at how it was introduced, it was too much. Samuel