On 7 November 2017 at 23:46, Brad Smith <b...@comstyle.com> wrote: > OpenBSD/i386 uses elf_i386_obsd for the emulation linker. > > Signed-off-by: Brad Smith <b...@comstyle.com> > > > diff --git a/configure b/configure > index dd73cce62f..c9dd747283 100755 > --- a/configure > +++ b/configure > @@ -5159,9 +5159,9 @@ if test \( "$cpu" = "i386" -o "$cpu" = "x86_64" \) -a \ > "$targetos" != "Darwin" -a "$targetos" != "SunOS" -a \ > "$softmmu" = yes ; then > # Different host OS linkers have different ideas about the name of the > ELF > - # emulation. Linux and OpenBSD use 'elf_i386'; FreeBSD uses the _fbsd > - # variant; and Windows uses i386pe. > - for emu in elf_i386 elf_i386_fbsd i386pe; do > + # emulation. Linux and OpenBSD/amd64 use 'elf_i386'; FreeBSD uses the > _fbsd > + # variant; OpenBSD/i386 uses the _obsd variant; and Windows uses i386pe. > + for emu in elf_i386 elf_i386_fbsd elf_i386_obsd i386pe; do > if "$ld" -verbose 2>&1 | grep -q "^[[:space:]]*$emu[[:space:]]*$"; > then > ld_i386_emulation="$emu" > roms="optionrom"
Hi; just a reminder that this patch is still blocked on getting an answer to why the correct answer for OpenBSD/x86_64 is "elf_i386" and not "elf_i386_obsd"... thanks -- PMM