On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 12:49:04 +0100
Boris Fiuczynski <fiu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 11/28/2017 11:22 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 09:53:15 +0100
> > Boris Fiuczynski <fiu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/27/2017 05:56 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >>> Proposal 2: Export the default cssid as a machine property. If this
> >>> property exists, it also implies that devices can be put into any css
> >>> image (although it makes the most sense to put them into the default
> >>> css image as indicated by the property). Can be made r/w later if it is
> >>> too much for 2.12.
> >> Just as a side discussion:
> >> I know of qom command query-machines but that does not seem to provide
> >> the information you suggest to use with proposal 2.
> Sorry, I meant query-command-line-options.
>
> >> What qom command do you suggest to use for the introspection of the
> >> machine options access mode?
> >>
> >
> > Is qom-get what you are looking for?
> >
> > virsh # qemu-monitor-command vm1 --pretty '{ "execute": "qom-get",
> > "arguments": { "path": "/machine/", "property": "accel"} }'
> > {
> > "return": "kvm",
> > "id": "libvirt-18"
> > }
> >
> How do you find out from returned values that accel is r/o or r/w?
>
I read some code and it turns out that we aren't really prepared for
any r/o opts... sigh.
So, proposal 2 is only viable if we make it configurable from the start.
Halil, do you see any chance to do this for 2.12? There's plenty of
time left, and I don't think it's too hard. If not, we don't have any
other option than proposal 3, even though I don't like it a lot.
