On 29.11.2017 21:26, David Hildenbrand wrote: > Let's use s390_program_interrupt() instead. > > Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org> > Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> > --- > target/s390x/fpu_helper.c | 2 +- > target/s390x/int_helper.c | 14 +++++++------- > target/s390x/internal.h | 2 -- > target/s390x/misc_helper.c | 16 ---------------- > 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
Is it a disadvantage that runtime_exception() was declared as QEMU_NORETURN, and s390_program_interrupt() is not declared as QEMU_NORETURN? At a first glance, I guess it's ok, and in that case: Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
