On Mon 20 Nov 2017 09:09:42 PM CET, Max Reitz wrote: > If the backing file is overridden, this most probably does change the > guest-visible data of a BDS. Therefore, we will need to consider this in > bdrv_refresh_filename(). > > Adding a new field to the BDS is not nice, but it is very simple and > exactly keeps track of whether the backing file has been overridden. > > This commit adds a FIXME which will be remedied by a follow-up commit. > Until then, the respective piece of code will not result in any behavior > that is worse than what we currently have. > > Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mre...@redhat.com> > Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alberto Garcia <be...@igalia.com> Berto
