On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Andreas Färber <andreas.faer...@web.de> wrote: > softfloat.h's uint32 type has least-width semantics, > whereas surrounding code uses uint32_t, so use uint32_t too.
I think patches 1 to 3 don't have much to do with softfloat, the type uses are just general sloppiness to use non-standard types instead of deliberate softfloat type use. So if there is a respin for some reason, please split off those from the softfloat patches and adjust the descriptions. Otherwise, if the patches are going to be applied, splitting is not necessary.
