Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 18.12.2010 um 19:53 schrieb Blue Swirl:
>
>> On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Bob Breuer <breu...@mc.net> wrote:
>>> ledma has 0x20 bytes of registers according to OBP, and at least
>>> Solaris9
>>> reads the 5th register which is beyond what we've mapped. So let's
>>> setup
>>> a flag (inspired by a previous patch from Blue Swirl) to identify ledma
>>> from espdma, and map another 16 bytes of registers which return 0.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bob Breuer <breu...@mc.net>
>
> I'm not familar with that part of code but...
>
>>> diff --git a/hw/sparc32_dma.c b/hw/sparc32_dma.c
>>> index e78f025..56be8c8 100644
>>> --- a/hw/sparc32_dma.c
>>> +++ b/hw/sparc32_dma.c
>
>>> @@ -165,6 +169,9 @@ static uint32_t dma_mem_readl(void *opaque,
>>> target_phys_addr_t addr)
>>> DMAState *s = opaque;
>>> uint32_t saddr;
>>>
>>> + if (s->is_ledma && (addr > DMA_MAX_REG_OFFSET)) {
>>> + return 0; /* extra mystery register(s) */
>
> Wouldn't it be a good idea to trace these "mystery" reads...
>
>>> + }
>>> saddr = (addr & DMA_MASK) >> 2;
>>> trace_sparc32_dma_mem_readl(addr, s->dmaregs[saddr]);
>>> return s->dmaregs[saddr];
>>> @@ -175,6 +182,9 @@ static void dma_mem_writel(void *opaque,
>>> target_phys_addr_t addr, uint32_t val)
>>> DMAState *s = opaque;
>>> uint32_t saddr;
>>>
>>> + if (s->is_ledma && (addr > DMA_MAX_REG_OFFSET)) {
>>> + return; /* extra mystery register(s) */
>
> ...and writes? We return just before the tracepoints fire.
>
Ok, I'll put together a patch to add the trace calls just before the
returns. How about I also call it undocumented instead of mystery.
None of the BSD's or Linux know about or use anything beyond the 4
registers.
Blue, do you know of a mirror for the documents at
http://wikis.sun.com/display/FOSSdocs/Home ? The pdfs there seem to
have gone missing, and maybe there might be something in the macio
documentation.
Bob
