On 16 October 2017 at 19:04, Michael Tokarev <m...@tls.msk.ru> wrote: > 05.10.2017 17:35, Marco A L Barbosa wrote: >> This is necessary to run android ndk applications. Without this patch, the >> following error is generated: >> >> FATAL: kernel did not supply AT_SECURE >> >> Should AT_SECURE from host be considered or is the ids comparisons enough?
If we just pass through the host AT_SECURE value that would mean we don't need to do the ID comparisons, right? (the host kernel will have done them for us). I think that would be better. We can do that with qemu_getauxval(AT_SECURE). thanks -- PMM
