On 08/01/2018 08:23, Thomas Huth wrote: >>> But instead of introducing a new "-braille" parameter, maybe we should >>> rather keep some of the convenience "-usbdevice" possibilities around? >>> E.g. keep "-usbdevice braille", "-usbdevice mouse", etc. but remove >>> things like "-usbdevice serial" and "-usbdevice host" where the code is >>> rather ugly and the user do not gain much in comparison to "-device" ? >> That would work too. But I'm not sure why keep all the usbdevice >> infrastructure when we can do the same (at the price of a small cmdline >> incompatibility) with only 50 lines of code. > I'm just afraid that we will end up with more new parameters in the end > than just "-braille" - or do we feel confident enough that "-usbdevice > braille" is the only one that would need a sugared replacement?
I agree that we should plan for suboptions, so it could be "-braille [serial|usb]" for now. Paolo
