On 2018-01-09 13:27, Laurent Vivier wrote: > Le 09/01/2018 à 13:22, Alex Bennée a écrit : > > It's not actively built and when enabled things fail to compile. I'm > > not sure the type-checking is really helping here. Seeing as we "own" > > our softfloat now lets remove the cruft. > > I think it would be better to fix the build break than to remove the > type-checking tool. > > but that's only my opinion...
I agree with that. Those checks are useful for targets which call host floating point functions for some instructions. This is ugly, but that's what is still done for at least x86 for the trigonometrical functions. The check prevents assigning a float or double value to a softfloat type without calling the conversion function. Now, when we make sure that those ugly things are removed, I think these type-checking might be removed. Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
