On 10/01/2018 10:21, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> On 10/01/2018 09:47, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 10:52:37PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>>> Argument file is also needed there.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com>
>>>
>>> Does it also mean this?
>>>
>>> Fixes: aaf89c8a49a8c ("test: port postcopy test to ppc64")
>>
>> Dunno. I was trying to consolidate the command line options for ppc and
>> x86 when I found this problem. I haven't tested of ppc.
>
> I don't think it is needed. I think the content of the nvram is migrated
> (otherwise the test wouldn't work at all).
>
> The nvram is created by default, we need the command line parameter only
> to populate it from a file.
A better change would be to use "-prom-env" instead of "-driver
if=pflash". I can send the patch if you want to add it in your series.
Thanks,
Laurent
