On 11 January 2018 at 10:15, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > RAM contents are memcpy'd blindly during loadvm. I think that's what > requires a tb_flush.
Ah, that makes sense. Could we have a comment documenting the rationale, please? Something like: /* vmload has just updated the content of RAM, bypassing the * usual mechanisms that ensure we flush TBs for writes to * memory we've translated code from. So we must flush all TBs, * which will now be stale. */ thanks -- PMM
