On 01/05/11 19:29, Anthony Liguori wrote: > I wouldn't make such bold claims but I'll concede that one is not > significantly better than the other and won't object to int64_t if you > feel strongly.
The more I think of it, the more I come to the conclusion that int64_t is the best solution. Since we can in theory have a system where we only allow 32 bit file system offsets, but have > 4GB of memory, int64_t does it best - it is more generic. Cheers, Jes
