now than the Exynos4210 uses the 'capareg-reserved' property,
we can safely report missing capabilities as error, since
capabilities will only get changed once new SDHCI models
are added.

Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@xilinx.com>
---
 hw/sd/sdhci.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/sd/sdhci.c b/hw/sd/sdhci.c
index d0d64f0c52..6232fcd914 100644
--- a/hw/sd/sdhci.c
+++ b/hw/sd/sdhci.c
@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@
  */
 
 #include "qemu/osdep.h"
-#include "qemu/error-report.h"
 #include "qapi/error.h"
 #include "hw/hw.h"
 #include "sysemu/block-backend.h"
@@ -1210,7 +1209,8 @@ static void sdhci_init_readonly_registers(SDHCIState *s, 
Error **errp)
     } else {
         capab = s->capareg & ~capab;
         if (capab) {
-            warn_report("SDHCI: missing capability mask: 0x%" PRIx64, capab);
+            error_setg(errp, "missing capability mask: 0x%" PRIx64, capab);
+            return;
         }
     }
 }
-- 
2.15.1


Reply via email to