On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 22:20 +1100, David Gibson wrote: > > David, I know you're busy with linux.conf.au, but it would be > > really helpful if you could carve out five minutes to look over > > Alexey's proposal again, with my reply above in mind, and let us > > know whether it looks a reasonable design. Doesn't have to be a > > review, just a quick feedback on the high-level idea. > > It looks ok, I think, but I don't think I'm really the right person to > ask. I do wonder if creating a throwaway instance could cause > trouble, especially for something like machine that might well have > gotten away with having global side-effects in the past. I think we > need to talk with someone who knows more about qom and qapi - Markus > seems the obvious choice.
Good point. CC'ing Markus to try and grab his attention :) -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization
