Peter Maydell, on ven. 26 janv. 2018 18:23:02 +0000, wrote:
> On 23 January 2018 at 14:48, Laurent Vivier <laur...@vivier.eu> wrote:
> > From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@ens-lyon.org>
> >
> > sched_get/setaffinity linux-user syscalls were missing conversions for
> > little/big endian, which is hairy since longs may not be the same size
> > either.
> >
> > For simplicity, this just introduces loops to convert bit by bit like is
> > done for select.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@ens-lyon.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Laurent Vivier <laur...@vivier.eu>
> > Message-Id: <20180109201643.1479-1-samuel.thiba...@ens-lyon.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <laur...@vivier.eu>
> > ---
>
> > @@ -10395,9 +10463,7 @@ abi_long do_syscall(void *cpu_env, int num,
> > abi_long arg1,
> > ret = arg2;
> > }
> >
> > - if (copy_to_user(arg3, mask, ret)) {
> > - goto efault;
> > - }
> > + ret = host_to_target_cpu_mask(mask, mask_size, arg3, arg2);
> > }
> > }
> > break;
>
> Hi -- Coverity spots that in this change, we now have a case
> where we set "ret = arg2;" which then immediately is replaced
> by "ret = host_to_target_cpu_mask(mask, mask_size, arg3, arg2);",
> making the first assignment pointless.
>
> It looks like we're now ignoring the host filled buffer size
> that is returned by sys_sched_getaffinity() and then adjusted
> by this bit of code. Shouldn't we be using that value in this
> new host_to_target_cpu_mask() code?
Indeed, will send a patch against this.
Samuel
