On 01/30/2018 12:34 AM, Fam Zheng wrote: > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <f...@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com> > --- > qemu-img.texi | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/qemu-img.texi b/qemu-img.texi > index 60a0e080c6..ec7e2f5d1e 100644 > --- a/qemu-img.texi > +++ b/qemu-img.texi > @@ -86,6 +86,13 @@ exclusive with the @var{-O} parameters. It is currently > required to also use > the @var{-n} parameter to skip image creation. This restriction may be > relaxed > in a future release. > > +@item --force-share (-U) > +If specified, @code{qemu-img} will open the image in shared mode, allowing > +concurrent writers. For example, this can be used to get the image > information
Actually, we only permit one writer at a time. Would it be better to say "allowing a concurrent writer"? > +(with 'info' subcommand) when the image is used by a running guest. Note > that > +this could produce inconsistent results because of concurrent metadata > changes, > +etc. This option is only allowed when opening images in read-only mode. After all, we are stating that this process (which must be read-only, because we can't have two writers at once) is permitting some other process to be the concurrent writer (but not multiple processes to be concurrent writers) -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature