On 29/01/2018 12:27, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 26.01.2018 15:46, Eric Blake wrote: >> On 01/26/2018 06:40 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 26/01/2018 10:19, Thomas Huth wrote: >>>> Last July, Eric Blake wrote a nice summary for newcomers about what >>>> QEMU has to do to emulate devices for the guests. So far, we missed >>>> to integrate this somewhere into the QEM web site or wiki, so let's >>>> publish this now as a nice blog post for the users. >>> >>> It's very nice! Some proofreading and corrections follow. >> >> Thanks for digging up my original email, and enhancing it (I guess the >> fact that I don't blog very often, and stick to email, means that I rely >> on others helping to polish my gems for the masses). > > Sure ... Would you like to give it a try this time and continue with the > patch, or shall I continue and send a v2? > >>>> +++ b/_posts/2018-01-26-understanding-qemu-devices.md >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@ >>>> +--- >>>> +layout: post >>>> +title: "Understanding QEMU devices" >>>> +date: 2018-01-26 10:00:00 +0100 >> >> That's when you're posting it online, but should it also mention when I >> first started these thoughts in email form? > > At least in the header we should have the current date, or the blog post > will not show up at the top of the blog. Not sure whether there is an > alternate field for the original date ... maybe we could rather add an > "originally written in 2017 ..." sentence at the bottom of the post instead?
I don't think it's relevant, as long as it's brought up to date when we post it to the web. Paolo
