On 01/14/11 13:57, Blue Swirl wrote: >>> That's OK, but the correct fix is to change the design of the machine >>> model to something more advanced where the unwanted objects are simply >>> not linked in, without any changes to board code. This is not so >>> trivial and also many devices are not architecturally clean yet. >> >> A lot of changes are need to obtain that goal, and I am not the right >> person to do them. Until that ideal design can be developed and >> implemented why not take a small patch that fixes the existing design? >> It's not a major change -- a very small one actually (4 files, 13 lines >> modified). > > So far the approach has been to make changes only in line with that goal.
That's a shame. I'll collapse the patch series and maintain it locally then.
