On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 06:31:53PM +0800, Liu, Yi L wrote: > From: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com> > > This patch adds IOMMUSVAContext as an abstract for virt-SVA in > Qemu. > > IOMMUSVAContext is per-PASID(Process Address Space Identity). > A PASID Tagged AddressSpace should have an IOMMUSVAContext > created for it. virt-SVA emulation for emulated SVA capable > devices would use IOMMUSVAContext. And for assigned devices, > Qemu also needs to propagate guest tlb flush to host through > the sva_notifer based on IOMMUSVAContext. > > This patch proposes to include a sva_notifier list and > an IOMMUSVAContextOps in IOMMUSVAContext. > > * The sva_notifier list would include tlb invalidate nofitifer > to propagate guest's iotlb flush to host. > * The first callback in IOMMUSVAContextOps would be an address > translation callback. For the SVA aware DMAs issued by emulated > SVA capable devices, it requires Qemu to emulate data read/write > to guest process address space. Qemu needs to do address translation > with guest process page table. So the IOMMUSVAContextOps.translate() > callback would be helpful for emulating SVA capable devices. > > Note: to fulfill the IOMMUSVAContext based address translation > framework, may duplicate quite a few existing MemoryRegion based > translation code in Qemu. As this patchset is mainly to support > assigned SVA capable devices. So this patchset hasn't done the > duplication. In future, if any requirement for emulating SVA > capable device, it would require a separate patchset to fulfill > the translation framework. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Liu, Yi L <yi.l....@linux.intel.com> > --- > hw/core/Makefile.objs | 1 + > hw/core/pasid.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/hw/core/pasid.h | 110 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 175 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 hw/core/pasid.c > create mode 100644 include/hw/core/pasid.h
[snip] > + > +#ifndef HW_PCI_PASID_H > +#define HW_PCI_PASID_H > + > +#include "qemu/queue.h" > +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY > +#include "exec/hwaddr.h" > +#endif > + > +typedef struct IOMMUSVAContext IOMMUSVAContext; > + > +enum IOMMUSVAEvent { > + IOMMU_SVA_EVENT_TLB_INV, > +}; > +typedef enum IOMMUSVAEvent IOMMUSVAEvent; > + > +struct IOMMUSVAEventData { > + IOMMUSVAEvent event; > + uint64_t length; > + void *data; > +}; > +typedef struct IOMMUSVAEventData IOMMUSVAEventData; > + > +typedef struct IOMMUSVANotifier IOMMUSVANotifier; > + > +typedef void (*IOMMUSVANotifyFn)(IOMMUSVANotifier *notifier, > + IOMMUSVAEventData *event_data); > + > +typedef struct IOMMUSVATLBEntry IOMMUSVATLBEntry; > + > +/* See address_space_translate: bit 0 is read, bit 1 is write. */ > +typedef enum { > + IOMMU_SVA_NONE = 0, > + IOMMU_SVA_RO = 1, > + IOMMU_SVA_WO = 2, > + IOMMU_SVA_RW = 3, > +} IOMMUSVAAccessFlags; > + > +#define IOMMU_SVA_ACCESS_FLAG(r, w) (((r) ? IOMMU_SVA_RO : 0) | \ > + ((w) ? IOMMU_SVA_WO : 0)) > + > +struct IOMMUSVATLBEntry { > + AddressSpace *target_as; > + hwaddr va; > + hwaddr translated_addr; > + hwaddr addr_mask; /* 0xfff = 4k translation */ > + IOMMUSVAAccessFlags perm; > +}; > + > +typedef struct IOMMUSVAContextOps IOMMUSVAContextOps; > +struct IOMMUSVAContextOps { > + /* Return a TLB entry that contains a given address. */ > + IOMMUSVATLBEntry (*translate)(IOMMUSVAContext *sva_ctx, > + hwaddr addr, bool is_write); > +}; A lot of the above seems to just duplicate stuff from IOMMU MRs and it's not clear why we need both. > +struct IOMMUSVANotifier { > + IOMMUSVANotifyFn sva_notify; > + /* > + * What events we are listening to. Let's allow multiple event > + * registrations from beginning. > + */ > + IOMMUSVAEvent event; > + QLIST_ENTRY(IOMMUSVANotifier) node; > +}; > + > +/* > + * This stands for an IOMMU unit. Any translation device should have > + * this struct inside its own structure to make sure it can leverage > + * common IOMMU functionalities. > + */ > +struct IOMMUSVAContext { > + uint32_t pasid; > + QLIST_HEAD(, IOMMUSVANotifier) sva_notifiers; > + const IOMMUSVAContextOps *sva_ctx_ops; > +}; I think the problem is here. The SVAContext represents a *single* PASID, and once you have a single PASID the resulting object *is* functionally equivalent to an AddressSpace (though effectively required to have nothing but a single IOMMUMR within it). It also seems to me unlikely that different PASIDs for the same device / IOMMU domain will have truly different sva_ctx_ops. It really seems to me the object you actually want is a level up from that, representing the whole cluster of address spaces indexed by PASID. They would have the same operations for all PASIDs in the cluster, but those would take the pasid number. > + > +void iommu_sva_notifier_register(IOMMUSVAContext *sva_ctx, > + IOMMUSVANotifier *n, > + IOMMUSVANotifyFn fn, > + IOMMUSVAEvent event); > +void iommu_sva_notifier_unregister(IOMMUSVAContext *sva_ctx, > + IOMMUSVANotifier *notifier); > +void iommu_sva_notify(IOMMUSVAContext *sva_ctx, > + IOMMUSVAEventData *event_data); > + > +void iommu_sva_ctx_init(IOMMUSVAContext *sva_ctx); > + > +#endif -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature