Michael Clark <m...@sifive.com> writes: <snip> > > BTW - I've integrated the following 3 branches into the riscv tree: > > - https://github.com/riscv/riscv-qemu/tree/softfloat-snan-abort-fix > - https://github.com/riscv/riscv-qemu/tree/riscv-qemu-upstream-v8.2 > - https://github.com/michaeljclark/riscv-qemu/tree/qemu-devel > > into our `riscv-all` integration branch, and we're now passing all FPU > tests, interestingly, including the NaN-boxing of single precision values > into doubles. We'll need to check that the riscv-tests testsuite is > exhastive enough... Suprised! I think Richard might have thought about > our NaN-boxing > issue or some other sort of magic is going on :-) > > - https://github.com/riscv/riscv-qemu/tree/riscv-all
Is the SNaN patch going to get re-posted now it has had a review? -- Alex Bennée
