After reading cpu_physical_memory_write and friends, it seems
that memory_region_is_ram is a more appropriate interface,
and matches the intent of the code that is calling it.
Cc: Sagar Karandikar <sag...@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Cc: Bastian Koppelmann <kbast...@mail.uni-paderborn.de>
Signed-off-by: Michael Clark <m...@sifive.com>
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <pal...@sifive.com>
---
target/riscv/helper.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/riscv/helper.c b/target/riscv/helper.c
index 523a275..c430e95 100644
--- a/target/riscv/helper.c
+++ b/target/riscv/helper.c
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ restart:
rcu_read_lock();
mr = address_space_translate(cs->as, pte_addr,
&addr1, &l, false);
- if (memory_access_is_direct(mr, true)) {
+ if (memory_region_is_ram(mr)) {
target_ulong *pte_pa =
qemu_map_ram_ptr(mr->ram_block, addr1);
#if TCG_OVERSIZED_GUEST
--
2.7.0
