On 03/22/2018 05:53 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 22 March 2018 at 08:01, Andrew Jones <drjo...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> I agree we should change the useless 1.0, but shouldn't we use
>> mc->name instead of mc->desc? mc->name would make it consistent
>> with pc-piix and q35 and also be a less verbose "version". We'd
>> get e.g.
>>
>>  System Information
>>         Manufacturer: QEMU
>>         Product Name: KVM Virtual Machine
>>         Version: virt-2.12
>>         Serial Number: Not Specified
> 
> I would vote for consistency with x86, I think.

Drew and you like ->name better because of its conciseness consistency
with x86. In my view virt-2.xx is not very informative. "Version" info
in real machine could be verbose. Using my Thinkpad as example:

        Manufacturer: LENOVO
        Product Name: 20FAS1EG0N
        Version: ThinkPad T460s

With that said, I will change it to mc->name.

> 
> thanks
> -- PMM
> 

Reply via email to