On 22 March 2018 at 19:12, Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> wrote: > Or if we don't patch the false negative, you can bypass checkpatch with an > ugly hack: > > return 0 + (...) | (...); > > (I'm NOT going to do that bypass - it's too ugly for my taste)
Yeah, that's definitely not something we should be doing. checkpatch has plenty of false positives anyway, ignoring one more is no big deal. thanks -- PMM
