On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 16:25, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 23 January 2011 19:56, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> Some architectures (like Blackfin) only implement ppoll (and skip poll). >> So add support for it using existing poll code. > > This looks wrong -- ppoll() is supposed to be atomic, but > your implementation isn't. Why can't we just implement this > by calling the host ppoll? (might need a configure test, but > that's straightforward.)
it's atomic from the apps' point of view, so what does it matter ? -mike
