Re-Ping for consideration? On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 3:03 PM, Christian Ehrhardt < christian.ehrha...@canonical.com> wrote:
> Hi, > maybe I missed a formal thing on this submission, but I don't see it right > away. > So for now just a ping on any updates in regard to accept this? > > On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Christian Ehrhardt > <christian.ehrha...@canonical.com> wrote: > > The hook already skips a set of rpm upgrade artifacts. > > Do the same with such files that might be created by dpkg. > > > > Fixes: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1484990 > > > > Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrha...@canonical.com> > > --- > > scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook > b/scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook > > index c27b29f..13aafd4 100755 > > --- a/scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook > > +++ b/scripts/qemu-guest-agent/fsfreeze-hook > > @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ FSFREEZE_D=$(dirname -- "$0")/fsfreeze-hook.d > > # Check whether file $1 is a backup or rpm-generated file and should be > ignored > > is_ignored_file() { > > case "$1" in > > - *~ | *.bak | *.orig | *.rpmnew | *.rpmorig | *.rpmsave | > *.sample) > > + *~ | *.bak | *.orig | *.rpmnew | *.rpmorig | *.rpmsave | > *.sample | *.dpkg-old | *.dpkg-new | *.dpkg-tmp | *.dpkg-dist | *.dpkg-bak > | *.dpkg-backup | *.dpkg-remove) > > return 0 ;; > > esac > > return 1 > > -- > > 2.7.4 > > > > > > -- > Christian Ehrhardt > Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server > Canonical Ltd > -- Christian Ehrhardt Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server Canonical Ltd