On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 16:22:53 +0200, Bastian Koppelmann wrote:
> On 04/06/2018 08:19 PM, Emilio G. Cota wrote:
> > Notes:
> >
> > - Did not convert {num,max}_insns, since the corresponding code
> > will go away in the next patch.
> >
> > - ctx->pc becomes ctx->base.pc_next, and ctx->next_pc becomes ctx->pc_tmp.
>
> Please call pc_tmp something meaningful, like pc_succ_insn, or pc_next_next.
For v3 I've renamed it to ctx->pc_succ_insn, as you suggested.
Thanks,
E.
