On 11/04/2018 05:49, Peter Xu wrote: > On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:45:32AM +0800, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 08:49:13PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote: >>> cur_mon was only used in main loop so we don't really need that to be >>> per-thread variable. Now it's possible that we have more than one >>> thread to operate on it. Let's start to let it be per-thread variable. >> Trying to understand the reason for this patch: >> >> Are there any users of per-thread cur_mon? > > Currently no. But if considering future OOB-capable commands, they > will modify cur_mon in monitor IOThread at least.
That's fine, but it shouldn't need the inheritance part. The monitor IOThread can set cur_mon when it starts. In general, relying on cur_mon should be avoided. Paolo
