On 13/04/2018 17:03, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 6 April 2018 at 16:17, Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@st.com> wrote:
Co-Authored-By: Mickaël Guêné <mickael.gu...@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@st.com>
diff --git a/linux-user/arm/target_syscall.h b/linux-user/arm/target_syscall.h
index 94e2a42..afc0772 100644
--- a/linux-user/arm/target_syscall.h
+++ b/linux-user/arm/target_syscall.h
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ struct target_pt_regs {
#define ARM_NR_breakpoint (ARM_NR_BASE + 1)
#define ARM_NR_cacheflush (ARM_NR_BASE + 2)
#define ARM_NR_set_tls (ARM_NR_BASE + 5)
+#define ARM_NR_get_tls (ARM_NR_BASE + 6)
#define ARM_NR_semihosting 0x123456
#define ARM_NR_thumb_semihosting 0xAB
diff --git a/linux-user/main.c b/linux-user/main.c
index 00810d6..1814578 100644
--- a/linux-user/main.c
+++ b/linux-user/main.c
@@ -720,6 +720,9 @@ void cpu_loop(CPUARMState *env)
case ARM_NR_breakpoint:
env->regs[15] -= env->thumb ? 2 : 4;
goto excp_debug;
+ case ARM_NR_get_tls:
+ env->regs[0] = cpu_get_tls(env);
+ break;
default:
gemu_log("qemu: Unsupported ARM syscall: 0x%x\n",
n);
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
This is a bug fix unrelated to FDPIC, I think.
Right, I'll resubmit it with an updated commit message.
thanks
-- PMM
.
