On 18.04.2018 09:40, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 20:21:31 +0200
> Christian Borntraeger <borntrae...@de.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> On 04/16/2018 05:44 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/target/s390x/gen-features.c b/target/s390x/gen-features.c
>>>> index 0cdbc15..0d5b0f7 100644
>>>> --- a/target/s390x/gen-features.c
>>>> +++ b/target/s390x/gen-features.c
>>>> @@ -447,6 +447,9 @@ static uint16_t full_GEN12_GA1[] = {
>>>> S390_FEAT_ADAPTER_INT_SUPPRESSION,
>>>> S390_FEAT_EDAT_2,
>>>> S390_FEAT_SIDE_EFFECT_ACCESS_ESOP2,
>>>> + S390_FEAT_AP_QUERY_CONFIG_INFO,
>>>> + S390_FEAT_AP_FACILITIES_TEST,
>>>> + S390_FEAT_AP,
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>
>>> Now I have to ask a very stupid question:
>>>
>>> I heard that the execution controls in the SIE block for AP are one of
>>> the oldest ones we have around. How can it be that the AP feature cannot
>>> be used before zEC12?
>>
>> It was a suggestion from the crypto team due to testability. Nobody has a
>> z196
>> with the older cards.
>>
>
> Might be worth adding a note to that respect?
>
We used to have the CPU model stick as close as possible to the real CPU
models.
Support statements should cover in specific products what is expected to
work and what not.
So is there any real (!support statement / !testability) reason to not
allow this feature on older CPU models that also had support for it?
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
