On 20.04.2018 16:52, Peter Maydell wrote:
> The handling of NULL chardevs in exynos4210_uart_create() is now
> all unnecessary: we don't need to create 'null' chardevs, and we
> don't need to enforce a bounds check on serial_hd().
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
> ---
> hw/char/exynos4210_uart.c | 20 --------------------
> 1 file changed, 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/char/exynos4210_uart.c b/hw/char/exynos4210_uart.c
> index c2bba03362..a5a285655f 100644
> --- a/hw/char/exynos4210_uart.c
> +++ b/hw/char/exynos4210_uart.c
> @@ -589,28 +589,8 @@ DeviceState *exynos4210_uart_create(hwaddr addr,
> DeviceState *dev;
> SysBusDevice *bus;
>
> - const char chr_name[] = "serial";
> - char label[ARRAY_SIZE(chr_name) + 1];
> -
> dev = qdev_create(NULL, TYPE_EXYNOS4210_UART);
>
> - if (!chr) {
> - if (channel >= MAX_SERIAL_PORTS) {
> - error_report("Only %d serial ports are supported by QEMU",
> - MAX_SERIAL_PORTS);
> - exit(1);
> - }
If I get the EXYNOS 4210 data sheet right, this chip has only 4 channels
indeed:
http://www.samsung.com/global/business/semiconductor/file/product/Exynos_4_Dual_45nm_User_Manaul_Public_REV1.00-0.pdf
So I think you should at least keep an "assert(channel < 4)" in here?
Apart from that, the patch looks sane to me, so when you add that assert():
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
