On 26.04.2018 21:53, Warner Losh wrote: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 5:22 AM, Kamil Rytarowski <n...@gmx.com> wrote: > >> On 26.04.2018 10:11, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> On 25 April 2018 at 20:57, Warner Losh <i...@bsdimp.com> wrote: >>>> I’ve foolishly volunteered to rebase all the changes that the bad-user >>>> mode folks have done to a recent master rev to get these changes >> upstreamed. >>>> A number of people have been working on this for a long time. It’s >> possible >>>> now to run almost any FreeBSD binary from all the architectures. We use >> it >>>> to do ‘native’ builds of tens of thousands of packages in a chroot (so >>>> building FreeBSD/arm packages on a FreeBSD amd64 box). The diffs are >> quite >>>> large (on the order of 42k lines), so I anticipate some bumps in moving >>>> this stuff upstream. >>> >>> So, first up, thanks for agreeing to do this. It sounds from your >>> mail like you're already pretty well aware of the usual pitfalls >>> with this kind of work, and I don't really have much to add that's >>> QEMU specific that nobody else has said already. >>> >>> One question I do have is about the other BSDs: bsd-user at least >>> in theory is supposed to support freebsd, netbsd and openbsd. >>> Your patchsets should fix freebsd, but do you know what the status >>> is of netbsd and openbsd? Upstream we do compiletest but no runtime >>> testing; I think last time I tried it they didn't work very well, >>> but it would be worth checking with the other BSDs downstream to >>> see if they're using bsd-user and to make sure we don't break anything >>> that is currently working for netbsd/openbsd... >>> >> >> I'm looking forward to see it updated for FreeBSD first. We can >> reschedule NetBSD part for later. >> >> Feel free to CC me for code review. >> > > Sure. Will do. Do you have NetBSD patches against the git repo as well? >
At the moment nothing sharable for NetBSD. > Warner >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
