On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 04:10:45PM +0800, guangrong.x...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangr...@tencent.com>
> 
> Fix the bug introduced by da3f56cb2e767016 (migration: remove
> ram_save_compressed_page()), It should be 'return' rather than
> 'res'
> 
> Sorry for this stupid mistake :(
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangr...@tencent.com>

Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com>

So is that only a performance degradation without this fix (since
AFAIU the compressing pages will be sent twice)?  Thanks,

> ---
>  migration/ram.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
> index 01cc815410..699546cc43 100644
> --- a/migration/ram.c
> +++ b/migration/ram.c
> @@ -1490,7 +1490,7 @@ static int ram_save_target_page(RAMState *rs, 
> PageSearchStatus *pss,
>       * CPU resource.
>       */
>      if (block == rs->last_sent_block && save_page_use_compression(rs)) {
> -        res = compress_page_with_multi_thread(rs, block, offset);
> +        return compress_page_with_multi_thread(rs, block, offset);
>      }
>  
>      return ram_save_page(rs, pss, last_stage);
> -- 
> 2.14.3
> 

-- 
Peter Xu

Reply via email to