On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Paolo Bonzini <bonz...@gnu.org> wrote: > On 01/27/2011 11:19 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:55:30AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> >>> Forwarding this from the GCC mailing list. Since patchwork isn't >>> more than a mail archive the way it's implemented in QEMU, this may >>> be a more interesting possibility. >> >> What features are you looking for beyond archiving? > > Well, you pretty much nailed it.
Glad we're on the same page. I wanted to see if you are looking for code review or patch tracking. I actually like the code review process used today - inline patches to the mailing list. It's hard to add value to that without making it more cumbersome. But patch tracking is definitely lacking and would benefit from something that aggregates and presents an accurate view of the state of unapplied patches. Stefan
