On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 03:41:43PM -0500, Babu Moger wrote: > The property legacy-cache will be used to control the cache information. > If user passes "-cpu legacy-cache" then older information will > be displayed even if the hardware supports new information. Otherwise > use the statically loaded cache definitions if available. > > Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.mo...@amd.com> > Tested-by: Geoffrey McRae <ge...@hostfission.com> > --- > include/hw/i386/pc.h | 8 ++++ > target/i386/cpu.c | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > target/i386/cpu.h | 5 +++ > 3 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/hw/i386/pc.h b/include/hw/i386/pc.h > index 2e834e6ded..df15deefca 100644 > --- a/include/hw/i386/pc.h > +++ b/include/hw/i386/pc.h > @@ -304,6 +304,14 @@ int e820_add_entry(uint64_t, uint64_t, uint32_t); > int e820_get_num_entries(void); > bool e820_get_entry(int, uint32_t, uint64_t *, uint64_t *); > > +#define PC_COMPAT_2_12 \ > + HW_COMPAT_2_12 \ > + {\ > + .driver = TYPE_X86_CPU,\ > + .property = "legacy-cache",\ > + .value = "on",\ > + },
This isn't enough if the pc-*-2.12 machine-type isn't using the macro. Before we do this, we need a commit similar to commit df47ce8af4a5, but adding pc-*-2.13 machine-types. The rest of the patch looks good to me, but I will suggest a clean up (that can be submitted a separate patch later, or included in v9) in a separate reply. -- Eduardo