On 06/13/18 10:48, Eric Auger wrote: > PATCH: merge of ECAM and VCPU extension > - Laszlo reviewed the ECAM changes but I dropped his R-b > due to the squash
Was there any particular reason why the previous patch set (with only the ECAM enlargement) couldn't be merged first? To be honest I'm not super happy when my R-b is dropped for non-technical reasons; it seems like wasted work for both of us. Obviously if there's a technical dependency or some other reason why committing the ECAM enlargement in separation would be *wrong*, that's different. Even in that case, wouldn't it be possible to keep the initial virt-3.0 machtype addition as I reviewed it, and then add the rest in an incremental patch? Thanks, Laszlo
