On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 01:32:55AM +0200, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu wrote:
> This introduces replacements for memory access functions like
> cpu_physical_memory_read(). The new interface can handle address
> translation and access checking through an IOMMU.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munte...@linux360.ro>
> ---
>  Makefile.target |    2 +-
>  hw/dma_rw.c     |  124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  hw/dma_rw.h     |  157 
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 282 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 hw/dma_rw.c
>  create mode 100644 hw/dma_rw.h
> 
> diff --git a/Makefile.target b/Makefile.target
> index e15b1c4..e5817ab 100644
> --- a/Makefile.target
> +++ b/Makefile.target
> @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ obj-i386-y += cirrus_vga.o apic.o ioapic.o piix_pci.o
>  obj-i386-y += vmmouse.o vmport.o hpet.o applesmc.o
>  obj-i386-y += device-hotplug.o pci-hotplug.o smbios.o wdt_ib700.o
>  obj-i386-y += debugcon.o multiboot.o
> -obj-i386-y += pc_piix.o
> +obj-i386-y += pc_piix.o dma_rw.o
>  obj-i386-$(CONFIG_SPICE) += qxl.o qxl-logger.o qxl-render.o
>  
>  # shared objects
> diff --git a/hw/dma_rw.c b/hw/dma_rw.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..ef8e7f8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/hw/dma_rw.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
> +/*
> + * Generic DMA memory access interface.
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2011 Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu
> + *
> + * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a 
> copy
> + * of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to 
> deal
> + * in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the 
> rights
> + * to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
> + * copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
> + * furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
> + *
> + * The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in
> + * all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
> + *
> + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
> + * IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
> + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL
> + * THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
> + * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING 
> FROM,
> + * OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN
> + * THE SOFTWARE.
> + */
> +
> +#include "dma_rw.h"
> +#include "range.h"
> +
> +static void dma_register_memory_map(DMADevice *dev,
> +                                    dma_addr_t addr,
> +                                    dma_addr_t len,
> +                                    target_phys_addr_t paddr,
> +                                    DMAInvalidateMapFunc *invalidate,
> +                                    void *invalidate_opaque)
> +{
> +    DMAMemoryMap *map;
> +
> +    map = qemu_malloc(sizeof(DMAMemoryMap));
> +    map->addr               = addr;
> +    map->len                = len;
> +    map->paddr              = paddr;
> +    map->invalidate         = invalidate;
> +    map->invalidate_opaque  = invalidate_opaque;
> +
> +    QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&dev->mmu->memory_maps, map, list);
> +}
> +
> +static void dma_unregister_memory_map(DMADevice *dev,
> +                                      target_phys_addr_t paddr,
> +                                      dma_addr_t len)
> +{
> +    DMAMemoryMap *map;
> +
> +    QLIST_FOREACH(map, &dev->mmu->memory_maps, list) {
> +        if (map->paddr == paddr && map->len == len) {
> +            QLIST_REMOVE(map, list);
> +            free(map);
> +        }
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +void dma_invalidate_memory_range(DMADevice *dev,
> +                                 dma_addr_t addr,
> +                                 dma_addr_t len)
> +{
> +    DMAMemoryMap *map;
> +
> +    QLIST_FOREACH(map, &dev->mmu->memory_maps, list) {
> +        if (ranges_overlap(addr, len, map->addr, map->len)) {
> +            map->invalidate(map->invalidate_opaque);
> +            QLIST_REMOVE(map, list);
> +            free(map);
> +        }
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +void *dma_memory_map(DMADevice *dev,
> +                     DMAInvalidateMapFunc *cb,
> +                     void *opaque,
> +                     dma_addr_t addr,
> +                     dma_addr_t *len,
> +                     int is_write)
> +{
> +    int err;
> +    target_phys_addr_t paddr, plen;
> +
> +    if (!dev || !dev->mmu) {
> +        return cpu_physical_memory_map(addr, len, is_write);
> +    }
> +
> +    plen = *len;
> +    err = dev->mmu->translate(dev, addr, &paddr, &plen, is_write);
> +    if (err) {
> +        return NULL;
> +    }
> +
> +    /*
> +     * If this is true, the virtual region is contiguous,
> +     * but the translated physical region isn't. We just
> +     * clamp *len, much like cpu_physical_memory_map() does.
> +     */
> +    if (plen < *len) {
> +        *len = plen;
> +    }
> +
> +    /* We treat maps as remote TLBs to cope with stuff like AIO. */
> +    if (cb) {
> +        dma_register_memory_map(dev, addr, *len, paddr, cb, opaque);
> +    }
> +
> +    return cpu_physical_memory_map(paddr, len, is_write);
> +}
> +
> +void dma_memory_unmap(DMADevice *dev,
> +                      void *buffer,
> +                      dma_addr_t len,
> +                      int is_write,
> +                      dma_addr_t access_len)
> +{
> +    cpu_physical_memory_unmap(buffer, len, is_write, access_len);
> +    if (dev && dev->mmu) {
> +        dma_unregister_memory_map(dev, (target_phys_addr_t) buffer, len);
> +    }
> +}
> +
> diff --git a/hw/dma_rw.h b/hw/dma_rw.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..bc93511
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/hw/dma_rw.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,157 @@
> +#ifndef DMA_RW_H
> +#define DMA_RW_H
> +
> +#include "qemu-common.h"
> +
> +typedef uint64_t dma_addr_t;
> +
> +typedef struct DMAMmu DMAMmu;
> +typedef struct DMADevice DMADevice;
> +typedef struct DMAMemoryMap DMAMemoryMap;
> +
> +typedef int DMATranslateFunc(DMADevice *dev,
> +                             dma_addr_t addr,
> +                             dma_addr_t *paddr,
> +                             dma_addr_t *len,
> +                             int is_write);

So len is in/out here which is a bit confusing,
and apparently not documented until you look at the usage.
I also don't think it needs to be dma_addr_t - it's not
an address. I don't believe we ever need to
translate more than 2G in one go: how about returning
the length on success, negative on error?

Or add a comment.

> +
> +typedef void DMAInvalidateMapFunc(void *);
> +
> +struct DMAMmu {
> +    DeviceState *iommu;
> +    DMATranslateFunc *translate;
> +    QLIST_HEAD(memory_maps, DMAMemoryMap) memory_maps;
> +};
> +
> +struct DMADevice {
> +    DMAMmu *mmu;
> +};
> +
> +struct DMAMemoryMap {
> +    dma_addr_t              addr;
> +    dma_addr_t              len;
> +    target_phys_addr_t      paddr;
> +    DMAInvalidateMapFunc    *invalidate;
> +    void                    *invalidate_opaque;
> +
> +    QLIST_ENTRY(DMAMemoryMap) list;
> +};
> +
> +static inline void dma_memory_rw(DMADevice *dev,
> +                                 dma_addr_t addr,
> +                                 void *buf,
> +                                 dma_addr_t len,
> +                                 int is_write)
> +{
> +    dma_addr_t paddr, plen;
> +    int err;
> +
> +    /*
> +     * Fast-path non-iommu.
> +     * More importantly, makes it obvious what this function does.
> +     */
> +    if (!dev || !dev->mmu) {
> +        cpu_physical_memory_rw(addr, buf, plen, is_write);
> +        return;
> +    }
> +
> +    while (len) {
> +        err = dev->mmu->translate(dev, addr, &paddr, &plen, is_write);
> +        if (err) {
> +            return;
> +        }
> +
> +        /* The translation might be valid for larger regions. */
> +        if (plen > len) {
> +            plen = len;
> +        }
> +
> +        cpu_physical_memory_rw(paddr, buf, plen, is_write);
> +
> +        len -= plen;
> +        addr += plen;
> +        buf += plen;
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +static inline void dma_memory_read(DMADevice *dev,
> +                                   dma_addr_t addr,
> +                                   void *buf,
> +                                   dma_addr_t len)
> +{
> +    dma_memory_rw(dev, addr, buf, len, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void dma_memory_write(DMADevice *dev,
> +                                    dma_addr_t addr,
> +                                    const void *buf,
> +                                    dma_addr_t len)
> +{
> +    dma_memory_rw(dev, addr, (void *) buf, len, 1);
> +}
> +
> +void *dma_memory_map(DMADevice *dev,
> +                     DMAInvalidateMapFunc *cb,
> +                     void *opaque,
> +                     dma_addr_t addr,
> +                     dma_addr_t *len,
> +                     int is_write);
> +void dma_memory_unmap(DMADevice *dev,
> +                      void *buffer,
> +                      dma_addr_t len,
> +                      int is_write,
> +                      dma_addr_t access_len);
> +
> +
> +void dma_invalidate_memory_range(DMADevice *dev,
> +                                 dma_addr_t addr,
> +                                 dma_addr_t len);
> +
> +
> +#define DEFINE_DMA_LD(suffix, size)                                       \
> +static inline uint##size##_t                                              \
> +dma_ld##suffix(DMADevice *dev, dma_addr_t addr)                           \
> +{                                                                         \
> +    int err;                                                              \
> +    dma_addr_t paddr, plen;                                               \
> +                                                                          \
> +    if (!dev || !dev->mmu) {                                              \
> +        return ld##suffix##_phys(addr);                                   \
> +    }                                                                     \
> +                                                                          \
> +    err = dev->mmu->translate(dev, addr, &paddr, &plen, 0);               \
> +    if (err || (plen < size / 8))                                         \
> +        return 0;                                                         \
> +                                                                          \
> +    return ld##suffix##_phys(paddr);                                      \
> +}
> +
> +#define DEFINE_DMA_ST(suffix, size)                                       \
> +static inline void                                                        \
> +dma_st##suffix(DMADevice *dev, dma_addr_t addr, uint##size##_t val)       \
> +{                                                                         \
> +    int err;                                                              \
> +    target_phys_addr_t paddr, plen;                                       \
> +                                                                          \
> +    if (!dev || !dev->mmu) {                                              \
> +        st##suffix##_phys(addr, val);                                     \
> +        return;                                                           \
> +    }                                                                     \
> +    err = dev->mmu->translate(dev, addr, &paddr, &plen, 1);               \
> +    if (err || (plen < size / 8))                                         \
> +        return;                                                           \
> +                                                                          \
> +    st##suffix##_phys(paddr, val);                                        \
> +}
> +
> +DEFINE_DMA_LD(ub, 8)
> +DEFINE_DMA_LD(uw, 16)
> +DEFINE_DMA_LD(l, 32)
> +DEFINE_DMA_LD(q, 64)
> +
> +DEFINE_DMA_ST(b, 8)
> +DEFINE_DMA_ST(w, 16)
> +DEFINE_DMA_ST(l, 32)
> +DEFINE_DMA_ST(q, 64)
> +
> +#endif

I am guessing the assumption is that address is size-aligned
(which is right) so translation will fail for all addresses
or pass for all of them. But in that case,
assert() is better?

> -- 
> 1.7.3.4

Reply via email to