On 2 July 2018 at 11:33, BALATON Zoltan <bala...@eik.bme.hu> wrote: > Thank you. Please agree on what should be the needed action here. It would > be a pity if this missed 3.0 because of this. Could it be merged before the > freeze if no obvious problems are found with that it can be removed later if > it causes any trouble (I think that's unlikely as it's only touches rarely > used parts).
These are bug fixes, so there is no strict requirement for them to get in for the softfreeze deadline. I agree that we should get these in for 3.0. thanks -- PMM
