Programmingkid <programmingk...@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Jul 4, 2018, at 11:39 AM, Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> wrote: >> >> >> Programmingkid <programmingk...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>>> On Jul 4, 2018, at 10:15 AM, Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org> writes: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Anyway, all of this has been broken long enough that it'll need to >>>>> wait til next devel cycle before anything further gets done. >>>> >>>> When it gets done should we add some explicit ppc tests to tests/tcg/ppc >>>> like we did with arm64 fcvt or would it be worth spending more time on >>>> the general purpose FP test suite Emilio was working on as part of his >>>> hard-float series? >>> >>> My vote goes to adding PowerPC specific tests. I already made some and sent >>> them to the list a couple of days ago. A general purpose floating point >>> test suite would probably not be able to test things like PowerPC floating >>> point flags. >>> >>> I'm not certain how we would add floating point tests to QEMU. I'm >>> guessing it would involve some kind of bootable image file that would >>> load and run the tests. Hopefully there is an easier way to implement >>> testing. >> >> You don't need system tests - this is all testable from linux-user. See >> tests/tcg/arm/fcvt.c and the .ref files in arm and aarch64 directories. >> Assuming the test isn't insane (like test-i386-fprem) we can just add a >> reference output recorded on know good hardware. > > My hope is to make testing the floating point unit as easy as 'make > test' or maybe 'make fp-test'. That would be "make check-tcg" -- Alex Bennée
