On Thu, 07/05 13:08, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 05.07.2018 um 09:36 hat Fam Zheng geschrieben:
> > A few trace points that can help reveal what is happening in a copy
> > offloading I/O path.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <f...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  block/file-posix.c | 2 ++
> >  block/io.c         | 2 ++
> >  block/iscsi.c      | 3 +++
> >  block/trace-events | 6 ++++++
> >  4 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/block/file-posix.c b/block/file-posix.c
> > index 829ee538d8..d3b1609410 100644
> > --- a/block/file-posix.c
> > +++ b/block/file-posix.c
> > @@ -1488,6 +1488,8 @@ static ssize_t 
> > handle_aiocb_copy_range(RawPosixAIOData *aiocb)
> >          ssize_t ret = copy_file_range(aiocb->aio_fildes, &in_off,
> >                                        aiocb->aio_fd2, &out_off,
> >                                        bytes, 0);
> > +        trace_copy_file_range(aiocb->bs, aiocb->aio_fildes, in_off,
> > +                              aiocb->aio_fd2, out_off, bytes, 0, ret);
> 
> I think it's preferable to have a common prefix for all trace points in
> a driver, so they can be enabled with a glob.
> 
> paio_* is the existing one for thread pool based file-posix trace
> points. Not sure if we like it or want to replace it with something
> else.

Yes, I think it makes sense to add a "file_" prefix.

Fam

Reply via email to